http://van-gils.org/wordpress/index.php/2006/12/26/requirements-terminology/ Weblog of Eva, Bas, Koen and Stijn van Gils Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:04:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://van-gils.org/wordpress/index.php/2006/12/26/requirements-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-10792 Roger L. Cauvin Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:52:11 +0000 http://van-gils.org/wordpress/index.php/2006/12/26/requirements-terminology/#comment-10792 very nice; I like the approach. I'd like to see how you flesh out the diagram with more detail about how use cases and requirements relate, and how nonfunctional requirements fit in. very nice; I like the approach. I’d like to see how you flesh out the diagram with more detail about how use cases and requirements relate, and how nonfunctional requirements fit in.

]]> http://van-gils.org/wordpress/index.php/2006/12/26/requirements-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-10220 Bas Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:46:02 +0000 http://van-gils.org/wordpress/index.php/2006/12/26/requirements-terminology/#comment-10220 I forgot to mention in the above text that this model does <em>not</em> include non-functional requirements. The point is that NF's can not be mapped (directly) onto features. Including NF's in the model would thus mean that the mandatory role contstraint on the fact type "Requirement stems from Feature" should be removedl. I forgot to mention in the above text that this model does not include non-functional requirements. The point is that NF’s can not be mapped (directly) onto features. Including NF’s in the model would thus mean that the mandatory role contstraint on the fact type “Requirement stems from Feature” should be removedl.

]]>